Dart arrow hitting in the target center of dartboard

IRS Cracks Down on Unreported Overseas Accounts

Pedram Ben-Cohen is an Attorney-at-Law and Certified Public Accountant (CPA) licensed by the State of California who practices in all areas of Tax Law. Mr. Ben-Cohen’s experience stems from practicing Tax Law at Latham & Watkins, LLP and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP where he represented high net worth individuals, public and private corporations, partnerships, s corporations, and tax-exempt organizations in connection with a broad range of tax-related matters including tax disputes with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Franchise Tax Board (FTB), taxable and tax-free acquisitions and dispositions, joint ventures, entity formation, and estate planning. He also gained tax experience working at Deloitte & Touché, LLP and the Tax Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

Mr. Ben-Cohen earned his law degree cum laude from Georgetown University Law Center. While at Georgetown, Mr. Ben-Cohen was a member of The Tax Lawyer, where he published The Real Estate Exception to the Passive Activity Rules in Mowafi v. Commissioner and the New Burden Shifting Statute, 55 TAX LAW. 961 (2002). Mr. Ben-Cohen has also published Public Civil Defenders: A Right to Counsel for Indigent Civil Defendants, 10 GEO. J. ON POVERTY L. & POL'Y, 1 (2003).

He earned a B.S. degree cum laude from the University of Southern California, where he majored in accounting.

Additional articles published by Mr. Ben-Cohen include:

  • "Payments by Majority Shareholders to Minority Shareholders to Secure Change in Control: Ordinary Income or Capital Gain?," Daily Tax Report, August 17, 2005
  • "Consideration of Subject Matter Jurisdiction of District Courts Required When Preparing Cases Where Taxpayers Seek Solely Statutory Interest." Daily Tax Report, November 30, 2004
FBAR and Voluntary Disclosure
  1. The Problem
  2. Voluntary Disclosure Program
  3. Examples
  4. Frequently Asked Questions

To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this document is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter that is contained in this document.

I. The Problem
  • Any U.S. Citizen or resident who has signatory authority over or a financial interest in a financial account located in another country is required to file a report with the Treasury Department on Form TD F 90-22.1 (Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Account), “FBAR,” provided the balance was more than $10K at any time during the calendar year.
  • President Obama promised in his campaign to target wealthy Americans who “do not pay their fair share” of taxes on the backs of the middle class and working poor. The Obama administration has set out to curb what costs the US Government an estimated $100 Billion in revenue annually.
  • Of course, earnings on the account must be reported on the tax return.
    1. Schedule B contains the following question:
      1. At any time during 2008, did you have an interest in or a signature or other authority over a financial account in a foreign country, such as a bank account, securities account, or other financial account?
        • Checking the box that says “No” subjects a taxpayer to a possible criminal charge of filing a false income tax return which is a felony.
II. Voluntary Disclosure Program
  • Who qualifies?
    1. Any taxpayer that makes a voluntary disclosure request, and who fully cooperates with the IRS both civilly and criminally.
    2. Taxpayer must come forward before contacted by the IRS.
    3. Taxpayers with illegal source income will NOT qualify.
  • What penalties will be imposed under the amnesty?
    1. All taxes and interest going back 6 years will be assessed.
    2. Taxpayers must file amended returns and FBARS for 2003 – 2008.
    3. Accuracy related penalty of 20% must be imposed. No reasonable cause allowed.
    4. In lieu of all other penalties which may apply, a penalty of 20% of the highest aggregate account balance in the accounts during the 6 preceding years.
  • A 5% penalty is available if ALL of the following conditions are satisfied:
    1. A 5% penalty is available if ALL of the following conditions are satisfied:
      1. The taxpayer did not open or cause the account to be opened;
      2. There has been no activity in the account (no deposits, withdrawals, etc.) during the period the account was controlled by the taxpayer; and
      3. Only the account earnings have escaped U.S. taxation, in other words, only previously taxed money has been deposited in the account.
III. Examples
YearAmount on DepositInterest IncomeAccount Balance
2003$1,000,000$50,000$1,050,000
2004$50,000$1,100,000
2005$50,000$1,150,000
2006$50,000$1,200,000
2007$50,000$1,250,000
2008$50,000$1,300,000
Example 1
  1. If the taxpayer comes forward and has their voluntary disclosure accepted by the IRS, they would pay $386,000 plus interest. This includes:
  2. Tax of $105,000 (six years at $17,500 -- $50,000 X 35%) plus interest,
  3. An accuracy-related penalty of $21,000 (i.e., $105,000 x 20%), and
  4. An additional penalty, in lieu of the FBAR and other potential penalties that may apply, of $260,000 (i.e., $1,300,000 x 20%).
Example 2

Same as Example 1, except the taxpayer does not come under the voluntary disclosure program and the IRS discovers the taxpayer’s offshore activities.

  • Taxpayer can face up to $2,306,000 in tax, accuracy-related penalty, and FBAR penalty. The taxpayer would also be liable for interest and possibly additional penalties, and an examination could lead to criminal prosecution.
Example 3

A U.S. Citizen decides to buy a flat in London so that he will have a place to stay while on vacation, and he might retire there. Opens an account in England and wires $500K to an account at the Bank of Scotland to use as a down payment. Two weeks later he turns that money over to his solicitor to close the purchase.

Example 4

A taxpayer was born in Israel; he has lived in the U.S. for 20 years, but still maintains accounts in Israel in order to provide for family members there, and to invest a portion of his assets in the growing Israeli economy.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question 1

Do all U.S. citizens and residents have to report foreign bank accounts? Or, only taxpayers who have accounts in Switzerland?

Question 2

  • What are some of the criminal charges I might face if I don't come in under voluntary disclosure and the IRS finds me?
  • A taxpayer may be convicted of tax evasion which is subject to a prison term of up to five years and a fine of up to $250,000. Filing a false return subjects a person to a prison term of up to three years and a fine of up to $250,000. A person who fails to file a tax return is subject to a prison term of up to one year and a fine of up to $100,000. Failing to file an FBAR subjects a person to a prison term of up to ten years and criminal penalties of up to $500,000.

Question 3

Has the September 23 deadline to come under the voluntary disclosure program been extended? If not, do you think it will be extended?

Question 4

Can I come under the voluntary disclosure program if I have unreported income in taxable years 2003 through 2008? What if I have unreported income prior to 2003?

Question 5

If I come under the voluntary disclosure program, can I recognize any capital losses incurred in foreign accounts during 2003 through 2008?

Question 6

I have properly reported all my taxable income but I only recently learned that I should have been filing FBARs in prior years to report my personal foreign bank account. May I come forward under the voluntary disclosure practice to correct this?

Question 7

I'm currently under examination. Can I come in under voluntary disclosure?

Download PDF

Client Reviews
I approached Mr. Ben-Cohen regarding a pending case with the State of California and my small business. During a time that was quite stressful, I found Mr. Ben-Cohen to be the perfect person to represent me and my company. He communicated with me in clear terms so that I understood everything that was taking place in a timely manner. He treated my situation with the type of candor you only find in a consummate professional and successfully negotiated a deal with the State of California that far exceeded my expectations. I found him to be kind, efficient, sensitive and nothing short of brilliant. I consider myself fortunate to have met him and highly recommend his services. I will not hesitate to use his firm in the future should a need arise. Google, We Care Spa
★★★★★
I am an international tax advisor and have worked with Pedram on more than a dozen difficult and challenging cases. Pedram's clients and fellow advisors highly respect him because he has an uncanny ability to quickly identify and work diligently to resolve his clients' issues. Pedram is pragmatic in his approach. He is transparent with his clients and dedicated to getting to a fair and reasonable outcome. I have attended an IRS Appeals conference with Pedram and would want no other attorney on my side. Pedram is extremely passionate in his work and representing his clients. He is also enjoyable to work with and develops very good relationships with his clients and fellow advisors. I highly recommend Pedram for any tax controversy work. Avvo, Curt
★★★★★
Top Drawer Tax Fraud Lawyer. Pedram got me out a CI jam I thought I would not resolve. He is also fair and reasonable with his billing. I interviewed 4 top Tax Fraud Lawyers in LA and went with Pedram...Glad I did! Google, Michael Jeppson
★★★★★
Pedram Ben-Cohen at Ben-Cohen Law Firm, PLC is one of the most incredible, creative, and caring attorneys I have ever dealt with. He gave us hope but also gave us the reality and worst case scenario. He fought for us tooth and nail. The attention and time Pedram put into the case was like no other. He charged us more than fair and was very reasonable in every aspect. He is not the kind of attorney that charges for every minute. I liked him very much not only as an attorney but as a person because he is very honest, is true to his integrity, and is dedicated to his clients. He loves what he does and has the passion to protect and defend his clients, which totally shows in his work and our outcome. We originally hired another attorney from a famous firm who basically did not give us much hope on our case . That is when we came to Pedram who won our case in a short amount of time and got us the outcome we were looking for. Because of Pedram and his creativeness, willingness, and dedication, he got us our favorable outcome. He is our go to attorney for sure, without a doubt. Avvo, Anonymous
★★★★★
A few years ago I had a major tax problem and I was looking for the right professional tax lawyer. I interviewed at least five experts and all of them were very professional. I am very picky. When I met Mr. Pedram Ben-Cohen, it took me no more than five minutes to decide that he was the one, and I was absolutely right with my intuition. He is very professional, knowledgeable, smart, and knows his job perfectly. In addition to all of his professional skills, as a person he is very friendly, pleasant, ready to help, and took care of me like I was his own family. I referred and recommended him to friends and family with tax problems and will continue to do so warmly to anyone. I know that he is able and will do his job the best way for his clients. He is my personal tax lawyer and expert and will remain so. Google, Shlomo Kattan
★★★★★
Contact Us
Contact form